Formation of a Global Intercultural Discourse of a Multicultural Person

Formation of a Global Intercultural Discourse of a Multicultural Person

Karakat M. Nagymzhanova¹, Klara M. Abisheva2, Assiya Sh. Albekova³,
Aizhan K. Kapanova⁴, and Yelena B. Tyazhina⁵

^1,2,4Turan-Astana University, Kazakhstan
^3,5S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of identifying a global intercultural discourse of communication participants, characterizes its parameters, and reviews strategies for its actualization. The purpose of the article is to build and justify a model of this discourse. The methods used in work include discourse analysis, modeling method (contrastive and comparative) analysis, transactional analysis, textual information analysis method, critical analysis, etc. Scientific results of the research: parameters of the global intercultural discourse are refined, its intercultural model is built, and discourses of the participants of intercultural communication are analyzed. The theoretical significance of the research lies in the development of a sample of global intercultural discourse that input in the theory of global discourse. The practical value of the work is that research results can be used both in the practice of intercultural communication and in the process of preparing monographs, textbooks, and training in the field of intercultural communication.

Keywords: Cognitive interpretant, discourse analysis, multicultural person, world of discourse, modeling method, global intercultural discourse

References

Adhikari, S., & Guha, S. (2018). Mediated communication and commoditization of the female gender: Discourse analysis Indian news magazines. Media Watch, 9(3), 501-519.

Al-Ahmad, S., & Awwad, R.A. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of selected newspaper articles addressing the chapel hill shooting incident. Media Watch, 11(1), 21-34.

Alefirenko, N.F. (2007). Theory of language. Introductory course. Moscow: Academy.

Antos, G., & Tietz, H. (1997). Texte als Konstitutives Formen von Wissen. Die Zukunft der Textlinguistik. Berlin: Niemeyer, Tubingen.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Gasparyan, G.R., & Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2014). Text as a discursive event. Questions of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 44-51.

Goleman, D. (2013). Emotional intelligence. Why it can mean more than IQ. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov I Ferber.

Gudkov, D.B., & Krasnykh, V.V. (1998). Russian cultural space and intercultural communication. Scientific Reports of the Faculty of Philology of Moscow State University, 2, 124-133.

Ionova, S.V. (2011). On the issue of signs of environmental communication text communication. Bulletin of Volgograd University, Series 2, Linguistics, 1(13), 190-197.

Karasik, V.I. (2013). The language matrix of culture. Moscow: Gnozis.

Khrolenko, A.T. (2006). Basics of linguistic culturology. Moscow: Flinta.

Krasnykh, V.V. (1997). Cognitive base vs. cultural space in the aspect of the study of linguistic personality (on the question of the Russian concept sphere). Language, Consciousness, Communication, 1, 128-143.

Kushneruk, S.L. (2013). Linguistic space modeling in advertising. Chelyabinsk: Publishing ChelGPU.

Kushneruk, S.L. (2014). Discursive world-modeling at the crossroads of cognition and communication. Cognitive studies of language, Release XVIII. Tongue. Cognition culture: methodology for cognitive research. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Lotman, Yu.M. (2010). Semii sphere. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo.

Magirovskaya, O.V. (2014). Cognitive characteristics of discourse. Cognitive language studies. Issue XVIII. Tongue. Cognition culture: a methodology for cognitive research. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Omarov, S. (1990). The pulse of life. Almaty: Alma.

Popova, Y.V. (2012). Discursive practices as explicators of taboo speech. Scientific and Technical Gazette, 2(148), 175-181.

Raggat, P.T. (2015). Positioning: dualogical voice. Mind and Culture Psychology, 25(6), 775-797.

Reimers, N.F. (1992). Protection of nature and the human environment. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.

Sabitova, Z.K. (2013). Linguoculturology. Moscow: FLINTA.

Safonova, V.V. (1996). Study of languages of international communication in the context of the dialogue of cultures. Voronezh: Istoki.

Salgano, J., & Clegg, J.W. (2011). Dialogism and the psych: Bakhtin and contemporary psychology. Culture and Psychology, 17(4), 421-425.

Smith, W.R. (2020). Organizing participation of a lifestyle sport: The constitutive power of new media discourse. Discourse Context & Media, 33.

Solodovnikova, N.G., & Shakhovskiy, V.N. (2010). Therapeutic function of the language as a problem of ecolinguistics. Ecolingvistics: people, language, and the environment. Retrieved from http://tverlingua.ru/archive/015/content_15.htm.

Stepanov, Yu.S. (1997). Constants. Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.

Tsekhovoy, A.F., Zykova, N.M., & Turkebaeva, K.T. (2017). Emotional intelligence as a manifestation of emotional culture. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, 6(2), 102-105.

Tsurikova, L.V. (2006). Intercultural interaction from the standpoint of cognitive-discursive approach. Questions of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5-16.

Ufimtseva, A.V. (1998). Ethnic character, self-image, and Russian language consciousness. Language consciousness: formation and functioning. Moscow: Nauka.

vanDijk, T.A. (1989). Tongue. Cognition communication. Moscow: Progress.

Verbitskaya, L.A. (2001). Globalization and internationalization in education and the importance of learning foreign languages. World of the Russian Word, 2, 15-18.

Vlasyan, G.R. (2013). The strategy of evading response in the conversion discourse. Questions of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 76-81.

Weinreich, U. (1979). Language contacts. Kyiv: Vishcha Shkola.

Yanchuk, V. (2016). Socio-cultural–interdeterminist dialogical metatheory of psychological knowledge integration. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 438-440.

Yanchuk, V. (2017). Intercultural dialog between antagonist: Is it possible? Warsaw: SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Zhakova, T.E. (2014). Discursive analysis of artistic text. Cognitive studies of language, Issue XVIII, Language. Cognition culture methodology of cognitive research. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Zhunisov, C. (1985). When dzhida flourishes. Almaty: Zhalyn.

Karakat M. Nagymzhanova (Full Doctor in Pedagogy) is a Professor in the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology at Turan-Astana University. Her research interests are socio-economic development of macro and microsystems, socio-cultural problems, forecasting, and information systems.

Klara M. Abisheva (Full Doctor in Philology) is a Professor in the Department of Social, Humanitarian, and Language Disciplines at Turan-Astana University. Her research interests are professional education, information technologies, modern educational technologies, and innovations in the field of management.

Assiya Sh. Albekova (Ph.D. in Philology) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages at S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. Her areas of academic interest are cultural studies and participatory development communication.

Aizhan K. Kapanova is a lecturer in the Department of Social, Humanitarian, and Language Disciplines at Turan-Astana University. Her research interests are socio-economic development, digital economy, management of economic systems, and service management.

Yelena B. Tyazhina (Ph.D. in Philology) is a senior lecturer in the Department of Foreign Languages at S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. Her research interests are journalism, television studies, and social media.