Data Matters: The Informatized Body in Cancer Narratives

Data Matters: The Informatized Body in Cancer Narratives

Meenakshi Srihari
University of Hyderabad, India

Abstract

The informatization of illness in the form of databases, scans, and reports results in the absence of affective data. The vulnerability caused due to illness leads to an excess of feelings that the scientific and often bureaucratic mundanity of medical records refuses to capture. How can the personal illness narrative supplement this absence of subjectivity in informatized medical representations bereft of affect? Reading the rendering of biomedical data in Tom Corby’s digital data documentary bloodandbones.org, Marisa Acocella Marchetto’s graphic somatography Cancer Vixen, and Brian Fies’s graphic caregiving memoir Mom’s Cancer, this essay argues that the ill person encounters data presented by the medical institution – made objective through the authority of science – and counters it through a textual refashioning of the self. I identify this palimpsestuous layering of affect as ekphrastic and study the formation of the cancer patient’s narrative self via ekphrastic remediation.

Keywords: Affect, data, remediation, ekphrasis, graphic medicine

References

Benjamin, W. (1968). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. InH. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (217-252),NY: Schocken.

Bennett, J. (2010).Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press.

Bolter, J. (2014). Remediation. In M. L. Ryan, L. Emerson, and B. J. Robertson (Eds.),The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media, Johns Hopkins University Press, 427-430.

Brosch, R. (2018). Ekphrasis in the Digital Age: Responses to Image. Poetics Today, 39 (2), 225–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4324420

Cartwright, L. (1995).Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine’s Visual Culture. U of Minnesota Press.

Chute, H. (2007). Our Cancer Year, and: Janet and Me: An Illustrated Story of Love and Loss, and: Cancer Vixen: A True Story, and: Mom’s Cancer, and: Blue Pills: A Positive Love Story, and: Epileptic, and: Black Hole (review), Literature and Medicine, 26 (2),413-429. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/lm.0.0005

Corby, T. (2008). Landscapes of Feeling, Arenas of Action: Information Visualization as Art Practice. Leonardo, 41 (5), 460-467.

—. (2013). blood and bones: metastisingculture. https://bloodandbones.org/

Couser, G. T. (2018). Is There a Body in This Text? Embodiment in Graphic Somatography, a/b:Auto/Biography Studies, 33 (2), 347-373.

DeShazer, M.K.(2013).Mammographies: The Cultural Discourses of Breast Cancer Narratives. University of Michigan Press, 2013.

Diedrich, Lisa. (2016). Comics and Graphic Narratives. In B. Clarke and M. Rossini (Eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman, Cambridge University Press, 96–108.

Dijk, V. J. (2005).The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging. University of Washington Press.

Fies, B. (2011).Mom’s Cancer. NY: Abrams Comicsart.

Johnson, B. (1978). The Critical Difference. Diacritics,8(2), 2-9.

Kember, S. (1995). Medicine’s New Vision? In Martin Lister (Ed.)The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, Routledge,95-114.

Latour, B. (1998). How to be Iconophilic in Art, Science, and Religion? In P.Galison, C. A. Jones and A. E. Slaton (Eds.), Picturing Science, Producing Art, Routledge, 418-440.

Lorde, A. (1997).The Cancer Journals: Special Edition, Aunt Lute Books.

Marchetto, M.A. (2014)Cancer Vixen: A True Story. NY: Pantheon Books.

Nayar, P. K. (2007). The Extreme in Contemporary Culture: States of Vulnerability, Rowman, and Littlefield International Ltd.

Rose, N. (2007).The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press.

Serfaty, Viviane (2004). ‘‘Online Diaries: Towards a Structural Approach.’’ Journal of American Studies, 38 (3), 457–71.

Smith, S., & Watson, J. (2010). Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives, Second Edition. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.

Sorapure, M. (2003) Screening Moments, Scrolling Lives: Diary Writing on the Web. Biography, 26 (1), 1-23.

Thacker, E. (1998)…/visible_human.html/digital anatomy and the hyper-texted body, Critical Theory<www.ctheory.net/text_file?pick=266>.

—. (2003). What is Biomedia?Configurations,11 (1), 47-79.

Willet, J. (2002). Imagining the self. Affective encounters, 285.

Wohlmann, A, and Madaline H. (2019). To be Continued: Serial Narration, Chronic Disease, and Disability,Literature, and Medicine37 (1), 67-95.

Zimmer, Z. (2018).Lossyness: Material Loss in the Cloud or Digital Ekphrasis,Revista Hispanica Moderna, 71 (1), 87-102.

Meenakshi Srihari is a Ph.D. student in the Department of English at the University of Hyderabad, India, studying cancer representations across media. Her research interests include the health humanities, graphic medicine, and transmedia studies.

Correspondence to: Meenakshi Srihari, Department of English, University of Hyderabad, Prof. CR Rao Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-500 046, India