Prestige vs. Reputation: Significance to Improve Public Perceptions towards Malaysian University

© Media Watch 11 (1) 119-133, 2020
ISSN 0976-0911 | E-ISSN 2249-8818
DOI: 10.15655/mw/2020/v11i1/49760
 

Prestige vs. Reputation: Significance to Improve Public Perceptions towards Malaysian University

 
JAMILAH AHMAD & NURZALI ISMAIL
Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
 
Corporate image and reputation is an essential element in any business organization. However, not many studies have been done on service-oriented organizations, especially universities. For the university that seeks to improve its reputation, creating desirable images and positioning of a university’s image are important. This study obtained some interesting discoveries as well as answering the research objectives. The results suggest that the respondents had better perception of the university’s prestige than its reputation. A comparison between the mean values across two groups that is the university’s internal public and external public shows that the university’s internal public perceptions on prestige, personality, and reputation were relatively high. Public perceptions on each of the university’s image indicators were however moderate. This study also posits that the university’s internal public perception of the university image was significantly different from the external public. The university internal public had a high or positive perception of the university image, whereas the external public’s perception was only moderate. This study draws attention to the need for improving the external public’s perception of the university. This will remove the perception that university is just an ivory tower and doing something that may not be relevant to the industries and society need.
 
Keywords: Malaysian university, prestige, corporate image, reputation, public perception
 
References
 
Alsaqer, L. (2018). Bridge between public relations education and culture: The perspectives of Bahraini female PR training practitioners. Media Watch9(3), 302-316.
Babbie, E. R. (2015). The practice of social research. Nelson Education.
Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Quality Assurance in Education24(1), 70-94.
Blazevic, V., Hammedi, W., Garnefeld, I., Rust, R. T., Keiningham, T., Andreassen, T. W., & Carl, W. (2013). Beyond traditional word-of-mouth: an expanded model of customer-driven influence. Journal of Service Management24(3), 294-313.
Bowden, J., & Wood, L. (2011). Sex doesn’t matter: the role of gender in the formation of student-university relationships. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education21(2), 133-156.
Carter, S., & Yeo, A. C. M. (2016). Students-as-customers’ satisfaction, predictive retention with marketing implications: The case of Malaysian higher education business students. International Journal of Educational Management30(5), 635-652.
Duarte, P. O., Alves, H. B., & Raposo, M. B. (2010). Understanding university image: a structural equation model approach. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing7(1), 21-36.
Helgesen, Ø. (2008). Marketing for higher education: A relationship marketing approach. Journal of marketing for higher education18(1), 50-78.
Hemsley-Brown, J., Melewar, T. C., Nguyen, B., & Wilson, E. J. (2016). Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: A special section. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3019-3022.
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market orientation in universities: A comparative study of two national higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Management24(3), 204-220.
Hemsley Brown, J., Oplatka,I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A               systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316 – 338.
Kazoleas, D., Kim, Y., Moffitt, M.A. (2001). Institutional image: A case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(4), 205 – 216.
Kilburn, A., Kilburn, B., & Cates, T. (2014). Drivers of student retention: System availability, privacy, value and loyalty in online higher education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal18(4), 1-14.
Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management35(1), 2-10.
Pampaloni, A. M. (2010). The influence of organizational image on college selection: what students seek in institutions of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(1), 19-48.
Salleh, M. I. M., Ghazali,  S. A. M., Awang, Z. and Sapiai, N. S. (2012).  The Effect of Plagiarism on the Corporate Image in the higher education: An extended TPB Model. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(4), 340-343.
Siti Falindah Padlee , Abdul Razak Kamaruddin & Rohaizat Baharun (2010). International                Students’ Choice Behavior for Higher Education at Malaysian Private Universities, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(2), 202-211.
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research68(2), 341-350.
Sharifah Faridah Syed Alwi, & Kitchen, P. J. (2014). Projecting corporate brand image and behavioral response in business schools: Cognitive or affective brand attributes?. Journal of Business Research67(11), 2324-2336.
Sheith Khidhir Abu Bakar (2017). Budget cuts affecting universities’ work. FMT News. Retrieved from http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/08/23/budget-cuts-affecting-universities-work/.
Spurgeon & Wondimu, B. (2018).  Perception and Practice of Public Relations among Municipality Employees in Ethiopia. Media Watch, 9(3), 437-446.
Suomi, K., Kuoppakangas, P., Hytti, U., Hampden-Turner, C., & Kangaslahti, J. (2014). Focusing on dilemmas challenging reputation management in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management28(4), 461-478.
Sultan, P. & Wong, H.Y. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: A qualitative research approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 70-95.
Sung M., Yang, S. (2009). Student-university relationships and reputation: A study of the                 links between key factors fostering students’ supportive behavioral intentions towards their university. Higher Education, 57(6), 787-811.
Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2015). Factors affecting university image formation among prospective higher education students: The case of international branch campuses. Studies in Higher Education40(7), 1256-1272.
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research66(9), 1279-1284.
Ziani, A. K., Elareshi, M., Alrashid, M., & Al-Jaber, K. (2018). Journalism Education in the GCC Region: University Students’ and Professionalism Perspectives. Journal of Communication Media Watch9(1), 52-68.
 
 
Jamilah Ahmad (P.h.D., Deakin University, 2005) is a Professor at the School of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). She is dedicated to advancing research in the areas of corporate social responsibilities, environmental communication, public relations, corporate communication, issues on integrated marketing communication, and digital media.

Nurzali Ismail (P.h.D., Monash University, 2015) is the Dean of the School of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia. His current research projects are in the areas of youth, social media, and crime.