© Media Watch 7 (2) 133-149, 2016
ISSN 0976-0911 e-ISSN 2249-8818
New Media, Space and Marginality: Control and Regulation of Cybercafe Use in Small and Medium Towns in Asia
TT SREEKUMAR1 & MILAGROS RIVERA-SÁNCHEZ1
1MICA-The School of Ideas, Ahmedabad, India
2University of Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa
This paper is about how cybercafés in small and medium Asian towns highlight new aspects of modernity. Especially in the context of Asian modernity, the introduction of ICT-shaped social spaces in the form of cybercafés leads to multiple conflicting rhetoric of empowerment and progress on the one hand, and risk and moral degeneration on the other. Through an ethnographic study carried out in twelve small or medium towns in six Asian countries, the research explores how new media technologies influence the contexts of reimagining Asia’s encounter with modernity. The paper is based on a study drawing from secondary materials and primary information gathered through extensive field work in six developing countries in Asia: Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines in South East Asia, and India and Bangladesh in South Asia. In this paper we set out to argue that the continuities, ruptures and innovations that constitute the Asian modernity, as well as their social impacts, are mirrored in the discourses surrounding the various technologies that embody this modernity, negotiating a new phase in its mediation and legitimization in Asia. In particular, new media technologies and social media are involved in multiple discourses of risk, opportunity and adaptation. In the case of the cybercafés in Asia, we argue that the situated nature of technological access gives rise to new dimensions of adaptation at individual and collective levels. Discourses emanating from representatives of civil society, State and various other stakeholders converge on cybercafés, and their attention on this particular space emerges as an indication of its complexity as a zone of mediated access to the worlds—both desired and undesired—that computers make possible. The complexity of defining an essential set of Asian values and a regionally unique trajectory of modernity notwithstanding, cybercafé users in small towns across the six countries studied faced similar pressures and options that motivated the calibration of access to multiple worlds. Global technologies are shaped by local realities as civil society stakeholders struggle to redefine boundaries of morality, safety and privacy, balancing these against necessity and opportunity.
Keywords: Heterotopias, modernity, youth, cybercafés, moral transgressions
Allen, J. (2006). Ambient power: Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz and the seductive logic of public spaces. Urban Studies 43:2, 441-455.
Appadurai, A (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press
Atkinson, R. (2003). Domestication by Cappucino or a revenge on urban space? Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces. Urban Studies 40:9, 1829- 1843.
Barnes T. J, (2004). Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Progress in Human Geography 28 565 – 595
BBC News. (2005, August 10). South Korean dies after games session. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4137782.stm
Bernstein, B.B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman and Littlefield.
Boase, J., Chen, W., Wellman, B. and Prijatelj, M. (2002). Is there a place in cyber-space? The uses and users of public internet terminals. Retrieved on 1/2/15 from http:// www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications//cybercafe/cafeprogress16-BWmerged.PDF Borges, J. L. (1962). Funes the memorius in labyrinths: Selected stories and other writings. 59- 67. New York: New Directions.
Breanne, F., Dudy, M. L., and Stage, S. (Eds.). (2013). The Moral Panics of Sexuality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buerk, R. (2005, December 13). Bangladesh’s feared elite police. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4522734.stm.
Cohen, S. (2002). Moral panics as cultural politics: Introduction to Third Edition. In Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of Mods and Rockers. vii–xxxvii. London: Routledge.
Cooke, J(2006). Heterotopia: art, ephemera, libraries and alternative space. Art Documentation, 25 (2). pp. 37-40. Cossins, A. (2015). Female criminality: Infanticide, moral panics, and the female body. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Critcher, C. (2009). Widening the focus: Moral panics as moral regulation. British Journal of Criminology, 49(1), 17–35.Critcher, C. (2011). For a political economy of moral panics. Crime Media Culture, 7(3), 259–275.
David, M., A. Rohloff, , P. J. Hughes (2011). The idea of moral panic: Ten dimensions of dispute. Crime, Media, Culture, 7(3), 215-228.
Dehaene, M., and De Cauter, L.(2008). Heterotopia in a postcivil society. In Dehaene, M. and De Cauter,L. (Eds) Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society. New York:Routledge.
Gonick. M and Hladiki, J. (2005). Who are the participants? Rethinking representational practices and writing with heterotopic possibility in qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.18 (3), 285–304
Graham, S. (1998). The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography 22:2, 165-185.
Jansson, A. (2009). Beyond other spaces: Media studies and cosmopolitan vision. Communication Review 12. 305-312. 2009.
King, M. (2015). The ‘knockout game’: moral panic and the politics of white victimhood. Race & Class, 56(4), 85–94.
Krinsky, C. (Ed.). (2013). The Ashgate Research Companion to Moral Panics. Burlington and Farnham: Ashgate.
Laegran, A.S and J. Stewart (2003). Nerdy, trendy or healthy? Configuring the internet café. New Media & Society, 5(3), 357-377.
Lagerkvist, J. (2010). After the internet, before democracy: Competing norms in Chinese media and society. Bern,Switzerland:Peter Lang.
Lefebvre, H. (1974–1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Liff, S and Steward, F. (2003). Shaping E-Access in the Cybercafé: Networks, Boundaries and Heterotopian Innovation. New Media and Society, 5 (3): 313-334
Lim, S. (2013). On mobile communication and youth “deviance”: Beyond moral, media and mobile panics. Mobile Media & Communication. 1, 96-101.
Lou, J. (2007). Revitalizing Chinatown into a heterotopia: A geosemiotic analysis of shop signs in the Washington DC ’s Chinatown. Space and Culture. 10(170) DOI: 10.1177/ 1206331206298547
Low, S. (2008). Gated communities as heterotopias. In Dehaene, M. and De Cauter,L. (Eds) 148 Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society. 153-165. New York: Routledge.
Lundtröm, R. (2011). Between the Exceptional and the Ordinary: A model for the comparative analysis of moral panics and moral regulation. Crime, Media, Culture, 7 (3), 313–33.
McCurry, J. (2010, July 13). Internet addiction driving South Koreans into realms of fantasy. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/13/ internet-addiction-south-korea.
McGregor, J. (2004). Editorial. FORUM 46:1, 2-12.
McKenzie, W. (2006). Gamer theory 2.0. futureofthebook.org. Institute for the Future of the Book. Retrieved from http://www.futureofthebook.org/gamertheory2.0/index.html McNamee, S.(2000). Foucault’s heterotopia and children’s everyday lives. Childhood. 7(4). 479-472. DOI:10.1177/0907568200007004006
Miller, D. and D. Slater. (2000). The internet. An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs, Perseus Books.
Nicholas, S and T. O’Malley, (Eds.). (2013). Moral panics, Social fears, and the media: Historical perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Ok, H. (2011). New media practices in China. International Journal of Communications. 5. 320- 341.
Pearce, J.M. and Charman, E. (2011). A social psychological approach to understanding moral panic. Crime, Media, Culture, 7 (3), 293-311.
Pertierra, R. (2008). The new media and heterotopic technologies in the Philippines. Human Technology: An interdisciplinary journal on humans in ICT environments, 4(2), 169- 185.
Petti, A. (2008). Dubai offshore urbanism. In In Dehaene, M. and De Cauter,L. (Eds) Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society. New York:Routledge.
Poster, M. (2005). Digitally local communications: Technologies and space. Conference presentation at Global and the local in Mobile Communication: Places, Images, People, Connections. June 10-12, Budapest.
Powell, A. (2004). Space, place, reality and virtuality in urban internet cafés. Proceedings of the second annual Canadian cultural studies conference. Feb 2004. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/765637/ Space_place_reality_and_virtuality_in_urban_Internet_caf%C3%A9s
Rajak, B. (2011). Pornography Law: XXX must not be tolerated. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing
Rubinstein-Ávila, E (2013) Accounting for – and owning up to – the messiness in crosscultural/linguistic qualitative research: toward methodological reflexivity in South America’s Internet cafés International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education Vol. 26(8): 1041-1061
Saldanha, A. (2008). Heterotopia and structuralism. Environment and planning A. Vol 40. 2080-2096. doi:10.1068/a39336
Shao, G. (2010). China’s regulations on internet cafes. China Media Research 6(3). 26-30.
Soja, E. J. (1995). Heterotopologies: A remembrance of other spaces in the Citadel-LA. In Katherine Gibson & Sophie Watson (eds.), Postmodern Cities and Spaces. 13-35. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers..
Sreekumar T.T. (2011). ICTs and development in India: Perspectives on the rural network society. London: Anthem Press.
Sreekumar, T. T. (2016). Asian modernity and the post human future: Some reflections. In Cheryll Soriano and Sun Sun Lim (eds.) Asian Perspectives on Digital Culture: Emerging Phenomena, Enduring Concepts, New York: Routledge.
Sreekumar, T.T. & S. Vadrevu, (2013). Subpolitics and democracy: The role of new media in the 2011 general elections in Singapore. Science, Technology and Society, 18(2), 231- 249.
Susarla, R. (2007, May 2). Cyber police to probe infonet secret cam case. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://www.hindu.com/2007/05/02/stories/2007050204800500.htm
Taylor, L.J. (1999). Re-entering the west room: On the power of domestic spaces. In Donna Birdwell-Pheasant and Denise Lawrence-Zuniga (Eds.). House life: Space, place and family in Europe. Berg: Bloomsbury Academic
Topinka, R. J. (2010). Foucault, Borges, Heterotopia: Producing knowledge in other spaces. Foucault Studies 0.9: 54-70.
Wallis, C. (2011). New media practices in China: Youth patterns, processes, and politics. International Journal of Communications. 5: 406-436.
Warschauer, M.(1995). Heterotopias, panopticons, and internet discourse. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 14.1. 91-121.
Young, S. (1988). Of cyber spaces: The internet and heterotopias. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 1.4. Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/9811/ hetero.php
Dr. T T Sreekumar is professor and heading the department of Communications at MICA-The School of Ideas, Ahmadabad, India. He is the author of ICTs and Development in India: Perspectives on the Rural Network Society published by Anthem Press, London. He has taught at the Department of Communications and New Media at the National University of Singapore.
Dr. Milagros Rivera-Sánchez is the head of the Department of Communication Science at the University of Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa. She has taught at the College of Journalism and Communications, Department of Telecommunication, University of Florida, USA; Department of Telecommunications at Indiana University in Bloomington, USA; and Department of Communications and New Media at the National University of Singapore.