Approaches to the Typology of Youth Political Content in Social Networks

© Media Watch 11 (4) 618-629, 2020
ISSN 0976-0911 | e-ISSN 2249-8818
DOI: 10.15655/mw/2020/v11i4/204635

 

Approaches to the Typology of Youth Political Content in Social Networks

 

Julia Alexandrovna Eremenko
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia 

 

Abstract

The article is devoted to determining the types of youth content in social networks produced by political power subjects. The study’s empirical base is the accounts of the social network Vkontakte, which are politically oriented towards young people and with the number of participants from six thousand. The statistical data analysis identified types of content and their typology according to the indicator of social engagement. Content monitoring of political posts, as well as obtaining basic statistics on social engagement, allowed to identify five main tasks of youth political Internet communication: increasing community members, identifying the needs of the target audience, building the reputation of the organization and the image of a political leader, engaging the target audience, campaigning, and also offer a set of types and forms of content for their practical implementation.

 

Keywords:   Political communication, Internet communication, social networks,   social activity, political content, Internet, youth

 

References

Akaev, D.K. (2016). Transformation of the Political Culture of Youth: The Role of Internet Communications. Bulletin of the Volga Institute of Management, 6(57), 153-156.

Asmus, N.G. (2005). Linguistic features of the virtual communication space. Dissertation. Chelyabinsk.

Barber, B. (2001). The uncertainty of digital politics: Democracy’s uneasy relationship with information technology. Harvard International Review, 23. 42–48.

Bimber, Br. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400103

Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17. 65–84.

Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211. DOI: 10.1080/10584600902854363

Carpini, D.M.X., Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dawkins, R. (2013). Egoistic Gene. Moscow: Corpus, AST.

DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Krueger, B.S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research, 30. 476–498.

Lebedeva, L.G., Orlova, L.V. (2019). The City as a Social Space of Interaction between Generations. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 42-62. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/603/4/042062

Merkulov, P.A. (2015). Youth as the main resource of “color revolutions” and the struggle for it. Power, 6. 63–66.

Mihajlenok, O.M., Malysheva, G.A. (2019). Political Effects of Social Networks in Russia. Sociological Research, 2. 78-87. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004012-6.

Morozov, Å. (2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104302141

Morozova, O.N. (2011). Political online communication: its role, functions, and forms. Political linguistics, 1(35), 156–162. 

Nahon, K., Hemsley, J. (2013). Going viral. Polity Press.

Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, Ð. (2005). The impact of the Internet on political activism: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(1), 19–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2005010102

Polat, R.K. (2005). The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication, 20. 435–459.

Ryabchenko, N.A., Malysheva, O.P., Gnedash, A.A. (2019). Managing political content on social media during the election campaign in the post-truth era. Policy. Political Studies, 2. 92-106. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.07.

Safonova, A.S. (2015). New forms of virtual political communication among youth. – Scientific and technical statements of SpBSPU. Humanities and social sciences, 2(220), 30-34.

Salau, A., Binti, A., Hamid, A., Ishak, N. (2015). Social Media and Youth Online Political Participation: Perspectives on Cognitive Engagement. New media and mass communication, 44. 8-15.

Samosvat, O.I. (2015). “Like” in social networks as an indicator of social approval in the teenage environment. Kazan pedagogical journal, 6. 148-150.

Scheufele, D.A., Nisbet, M.C. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X0200700304

Shomova, S.A. (2015). Political Internet Meme: Essence, Specificity, Varieties – Business. Society. Power, 22. 28–41.

Shulman, S.W. (2005). The Internet still might (but probably will not) change everything: Stakeholder views on the future of electronic rulemaking. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 1(1), 111–145.

Solenikova, N.V. (2007). Political Internet in Russian Election Campaigns: Trends and Development Problems. Ufa.

Sorokin, Ju.A. (1990). Creolized texts and their communication. Optimization of speech impact. Moscow: Nauka.

Stanley, W., Weare, C. (2004). Effects of Internet use on political participation: Evidence from an agency online discussion forum. Administration & Society, 36(5), 503–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399704268503

Tobin, S.J., Vanman, E.J., Verreynne, M., Saeri, A.K. (2015). Threats to belonging on Facebook: lurking and ostracism. Social Influence, 10(1), 31-42. DOI: 10.1080/15534510.2014.893924

Tolbert, C.J., McNeal, R.S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600206

Utami, P. (2017).  The role of viral video in Indonesian politics. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 19(3).

Vettehen, P.G.J, Hagemann, C.P.M., Van Snippenburg, L.B. (2004). Political knowledge and media use in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 20. 415–424.

Ward, S., Gibson, R., Lusoli, W. (2003). Online participation and mobilisation in Britain: Hype, hope, and reality. Parliamentary Affairs, 56. 652–668.

Weber, L.M., Loumakis, A., Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21. 26–42.

Xenos, M., Vromen, A.D., Loader, B. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151-167. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318

 

Julia Alexandrovna Eremenko is a Professor in the Department of Marketing, Trade and Customs Affairs Department, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russia. Dr. Eremenko’s research interests lie in marketing communications, internet marketing, neuro communications.

 

Correspondence to: Julia Alexandrovna Eremenko, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Prospekt Vernadskogo 4, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea 295007

 

© 2020 by the author. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits any use, reproduction, and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed properly. The article may be reused without special permission provided that the original article is properly attributed. The reuse of an article does not imply prior approval by the authors or Media Watch.